Review policy for FULL PAPER
When the full paper is submitted, it undergoes a double-blind review process by members of the Scientific Board of reviewers of Tradition and Reform Conference 2013.
One paper is evaluated by at least 2 reviewers. In case one reviewer accepts the paper and the other rejects it, the final decision will be taken by one of the Scientific Committee member.
This review aims to ensure that the paper is relevant to the conference, the quality is sufficiently high to be accepted for presentation at the conference and publication in the conference proceedings, and that it meets the submission criteria established by the committee.
Tradition and Reform Conference 2013 aims to fulfill the highest academic standards in social sciences.
A poor English text will be rejected, the authors being strongly advised to use a native English speaker for proof reading.
The Organizing Committee